Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Judith J. Wurtman, PhD: Choosing Between Good Mood and Bad Weight

Judith J. Wurtman, PhD: Choosing Between Good Mood and Bad Weight

The woman's story was familiar. She had suffered on and off from depression most of her adult life. Often it was necessary to be on antidepressants for a year or more and then, as she explained, she would be well enough to stop taking them.... for a little while.

"I have resigned myself to needing treatment possibly for the rest of my life" she told me. "But what I cannot accept is the weight gain. I know it is caused by the drugs because as soon as I stop taking them, the weight comes off. But then I get depressed."

This woman -- let us call her Joanne -- is experiencing one of the more common side effects of antidepressants: weight gain. She is one of the lucky ones, as she rarely gains more than 30 pounds each time she starts on the drug. Some medications, such as those used for bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, can cause 100 or more pounds to be gained in a year. The mood disorders may be under control, but the subsequent weight gain produces its own constellation of problems such as diabetes, high blood pressure, orthopedic pain, and an increased risk of infection.

People who become obese in association with their antidepressant or bipolar disorder treatment are not like others who struggle with eating issues all their adult life. Many of them had been thin before drug treatment; they ate healthy diets, and never had problems with cravings, controlling portion sizes, or exercising on a regular basis. When we saw such patients at our psychiatric hospital-based weight loss clinic, we often had to explain to them how to follow a diet, since many had never previously dieted in their lives.

There are no data on what percentage of people taking these medications become obese. But surveys from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have reported an astonishing large number of Americans 12 years of age and older who are taking antidepressant medications. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted from 2005 to 2008 found that 11 percent of Americans are on these medications and of this group, more than 60 percent have been taking the antidepressants for two or more years. Apparently antidepressants are the third most common prescription drug taken by Americans of all ages during this timeframe. However, until surveys on the health of Americans inquire about a link between weight gain and antidepressant and related drug treatment, we can only speculate if these drugs are contributing to the obesity "epidemic."

But for Joanne and others whose weight gain is directly linked to antidepressant treatment, help should not have to wait until they become a statistic for help. The 11 percent of Americans who are on antidepressant medication, mood stabilizers and antipsychotic drugs may represent a sub-group within the population at risk for obesity. They are on these medications because of their illness, but they should not have to choose between weight gain and a stable mood.

Programs dealing with the special dieting needs of this population are not common. Perhaps it is, sadly, because they are viewed as obese individuals who simply have to stop eating fried cookies, bacon cheeseburgers, and 64-ounce sodas, and instead start a vigorous exercise program to lose weight. This simplistic approach works for no one, because the causes of obesity are complex. But those formerly thin individuals who now weigh 60 or 100 pounds more than they used to because of their medication need dietary advice that is compatible with their drug's effect on their brain neurotransmitters. Often the advice is non-existent, the individual is told to sign up for a generic weight-loss program, or given the wrong dietary advice. Several years ago, after our book The Serotonin Power Diet was published, I received a frantic phone call from a woman in the Midwest. She suffered from severe depression but responded to antidepressants. Unfortunately, she had gained over 50 pounds, and her doctor told her to lose weight by cutting out carbohydrates. "I read your book, the doctor told me and I know that my brain won't make any serotonin unless I eat carbohydrates. And my drugs need serotonin in my brain in order to work. But the doctor insisted and so I went on the Atkins diet. " Two weeks later, she told me, her depression increased and she was still unable to control her food intake.

Although some research has pointed to a possible interaction of some of these drugs with cells sites that normally control food intake, there is still remarkably little information as to why these drugs remove satiety and normal meal termination (jargon for not eating any more once you are full). Our approach has been to attempt to increase the brain's control of satiety through diet. Consuming small amounts of carbohydrates such as oatmeal, pasta, and/or bread eaten with little or no protein and fat, results in an increase in brain serotonin. And it is established that one of the functions of brain serotonin is to halt food intake.

We developed a food plan that increases serotonin at intervals through the day and found that patients at our weight management center were able to lose weight. Many of them were on two or three medications, each one of which caused weight gain, so their weight loss was significant. But to be effective, weight loss programs for the antidepressant user must also include exercise recommendations that are sensitive to the embarrassment many expressed at taking their suddenly overweight bodies to the gym.

Finally, support groups or workshops should be available so people who have suddenly moved from a normal weight to overweight or obese can share their experiences and give each other support. No one should have to choose between a good mood and a good weight.

For more by Judith J. Wurtman, Ph.D., click here.

For more on weight loss, click here.

Follow Judith J. Wurtman, PhD on Twitter: www.twitter.com/stopmed_wt_gain

FOLLOW HEALTH AND FITNESS


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Fewer Teens Are Doing This Dangerous (And Illegal) Activity

Fewer Teens Are Doing This Dangerous (And Illegal) Activity

Fewer teens are drinking and driving, according to a new government report.

Researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that drunk driving among teens has decreased by 54 percent over the last 20 years.

The study included data from the national Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System between 1991 and 2011 (there were anywhere from 10,904 to 16,410 students who participated each year). Among the findings:

- In 2011, nine out of 10 teens ages 16 and older said that they didn't drink and drive.

- Binge drinking seemed to be linked with drunk driving in teens. Specifically, 85 percent of teens who said that they had driven under the influence of alcohol in the last month also said that they had participated in binge drinking (five or more drinks).

- High-school boys who were at least age 18 were the most likely to say that they'd driven drunk -- 18 percent -- while 16-year-old high-school girls were the least likely to say they'd driven drunk -- 6 percent.

"We are moving in the right direction. Rates of teen drinking and driving have been cut in half in 20 years," Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., said in a statement. "But we must keep up the momentum -- one in 10 high school teens, aged 16 and older, drinks and drives each month, endangering themselves and others."

According to previous research reported by the CDC, more than 40 percent of high-schoolers have admitted to drinking alcohol in some amount over the previous month.

Also on HuffPost:


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

Monday, October 1, 2012

Dr. David White, M.D.: How Much Sleep Do Students Actually Need?

Dr. David White, M.D.: How Much Sleep Do Students Actually Need?

The challenges of a new school year begin to enter the minds of students and parents around this time of year. Nobody wants to be set up for poor performance before the first bell even rings. However, poor sleep habits of elementary, middle and high school students are making them sluggish during the day, may hinder their success at school and will likely contribute to long-term health problems.

How much sleep do students actually need? There is some variability based on the needs of individual children. The generally established values are as follows:

Age (years) Total Hours of Sleep Typical Range
6 10.5 10-11
10 10 9.5-10.5
14 9.5 9-10
18 9 8.5-9.5

The subjective quality of feeling rested when waking up, or general sleep satisfaction, is difficult to quantify but may also impact performance. While most studies include imperfect and subjective metrics (such as subjective reports of sleep quality, variable measures of academic performance ranging from grade point average to teacher comments), the preponderance of data suggests that reduced total sleep time, erratic sleep schedules, poor sleep quality (difficulty falling asleep or waking up at night), and sleepiness during the day are all associated with poorer academic performance.[1],[2]

Most of these effects are small to moderate, with only modest correlation between grades and subjective sleep measures. Many other variables are likely to influence school performance including school size, family socioeconomic status, teacher salaries, school facilities, and student hours of employment, among others.

A large majority of students, especially those in middle school and high school, have a very hard time developing and keeping proper sleep habits. Adolescents and teenagers go to bed too late. Constant use of technology (Internet, television, text messages, etc.) and an "always plugged in" lifestyle contribute to many students' bedtime habits. There is increasing evidence that adolescents, particularly pubertal or post-pubertal teens, may have trouble falling asleep early enough to get adequate rest even if they are willing to try.

The explanation for this relates to a delay in circadian rhythm. The circadian clock in our brain drives many behaviors over the 24-hour daily cycle, one of which is when we sleep and when we are awake. If this clock dictates a late bedtime and late rise time (a so-called "delayed phase"), it is difficult to both fall asleep at night at a reasonable hour and get up in the morning in time for school. Why adolescents tend to have a delayed clock is just beginning to be understood.[3],[4]

Some students may have an actual sleep disorder. The common disorders in children and adolescents are insomnia and an extremely delayed circadian phase (as outlined above). Some students may have sleep apnea as well. These disorders can all affect sleep duration and sleep quality and contribute to poor performance during the day.

So, what can be done?

Promote consistent bedtime and wakeup routines. Children and adolescents should have enough time in bed to get the required sleep based on the numbers provided above. Consistent bedtime and wakeup time also promotes better sleep quality.

Turn off the light. Exposure to bright light in the evening tends to further delay the circadian clock making it more difficult to fall asleep at the desired bedtime. Softer lighting and less time in front of a computer screen is advisable in the evening.

Talk to a specialist. If the child or adolescent has consistent difficulty falling asleep or wakes up during the night with difficulty returning to sleep a physician's advice should be sought. This could be a true delayed sleep phase disorder or another type of insomnia. If there are signs that the student is sleepy during the day, the cause should be explored medically, particularly if the student appears to be getting adequate sleep at night.

As students get back into a school year routine, it is important to make sure everyone gets a passing grade in Sleep 101!

For more by Dr. David White, M.D., click here.

For more on sleep, click here.

References:

[1] Wolfson AR and Carskadon MA. Understanding adolescents' sleep patterns and school performance: a critical review. Sleep Med Rev 2003; 7: 491-506.

[2] Dewald JF, Meijer AM, Oort FJ, Kerkhof GA, and Bogels SM. The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Sleep Med Rev 2010; 14: 179-189.

[3] Hagenauer MH, Perryman JI, Lee TM, and Carskadon MA. Adolescent changes in the homeostatic and circadian regulation of sleep. Dev Neurosci 2009; 31: 276-284.

[4] Crowley SJ, Acebo C, and Carskadon MA. Sleep, circadian rhythms, and delayed phase in adolescence. Sleep Med 2007; 8: 602-612.

FOLLOW HEALTH AND FITNESS


Source: www.huffingtonpost.com